A Systems Thinking Practitioner tackles complex problems by analyzing situations, identifying patterns, and proposing solutions. They bridge theory and practice, fostering collaboration and a culture of systems thinking to drive organizational learning and inform everyday decision-making.
Details of standard
The Systems Thinking Practitioner (STP) operates in contexts where intricate problems cannot be resolved by a single organization or individual, necessitating cross-boundary collaboration among various entities.
Typical employers for STPs include central and local government agencies, multilateral organizations, defense sectors, educational and research institutions, healthcare services, multinational corporations with complex supply chains, international banks, NGOs, social enterprises tackling societal issues, and consulting firms collaborating with these sectors.
The primary goal of this role is to assist decision-makers in strategic and leadership capacities to comprehend and tackle complex, often "wicked," problems through expert systemic analysis, advice, and facilitation.
Examples of such challenges include integrating health and social services to create a seamless support system for vulnerable populations; reducing carbon emissions in the manufacturing sector by implementing sustainable practices; developing sustainable urban transportation systems that involve cooperation between local governments, private transport companies, and residents; enhancing corporate social responsibility initiatives that align with community needs and regulatory frameworks; addressing cybersecurity threats through collaboration between technology firms, government agencies, and consumers; optimizing supply chain management to adapt to global disruptions while ensuring ethical sourcing; creating inclusive hiring practices that promote diversity within organizations, requiring collaboration between HR, leadership, and community organizations; and combatting climate change through joint efforts between corporations, governments, and NGOs to implement renewable energy solutions.
These issues lack a singular owner or cause and do not present straightforward solutions; they require multidisciplinary and multi-organizational responses, considering diverse perspectives, behaviors, cultures, and political landscapes.
The intricate nature of these challenges makes traditional organizational change methods inadequate. Instead, a skill set focused on collaborative inquiry and analysis is essential, utilizing systemic models and tools to gather and synthesize varied evidence, develop intervention and investment options, facilitate dialogue, and empathetically navigate power dynamics and political contexts.
While the ultimate aim is to address highly complex issues involving multiple organizations, sectors, communities, and even nations to develop sustainable solutions, the Systems Thinking Practitioner does not assume direct responsibility for these outcomes. They facilitate collaboration among stakeholders, both organizations and individuals, applying their specialized systemic knowledge and skills to assist decision-makers in comprehending challenges and co-developing effective interventions.
In their day-to-day activities, Systems Thinking Practitioners engage with decision-makers, strategists, and policy-makers, often in senior positions within public or private sectors, as well as individuals and groups (both internal and external) invested in the defined system, now or in the future.
They also collaborate with peers, change agents, and consultants addressing similar challenges. Typically, they operate with a high degree of autonomy, allowing them to connect broadly with various stakeholders in their operational environment.
Provide expert solutions for complex problems that span multiple organizations and government entities, as well as private sector challenges.
Collaborate with colleagues, stakeholders, and decision-makers to establish shared methods for defining, interpreting, and understanding the system of interest through models, visuals, narratives, and maps.
Analyze patterns, dynamics, power structures, and interrelationships within the system using systems thinking methodologies, rigorously applying relevant tools and theories (such as systems science, complexity science, social psychology, and action research) to uncover new insights and perspectives.
Partner with key actors to co-design effective experiments and interventions, including activities, policies, new products or services, and governance structures, while assessing their fitness and effectiveness.
Investigate outcomes and consequences while facilitating collective learning.
Ensure that intervention and engagement strategies comply with ethical and legal standards.
Assume the role of co-learner and active participant within the examined system, recognizing the iterative nature of their work and the influence of their actions on the system dynamics.
Engage with decision-makers
Engage with decision-makers, e.g., strategy, policy, societal, and organisation leaders, to explore initial perspectives, concerns, and hopes about the challenges and opportunities being faced by their organisation, society, or socio-ecological system, in order to determine the initial scope of the work.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Clear, agreed scoping statements and contracting with key decision-makers, that embrace a holistic, multi-stakeholder approach.
KSBs: K1, K3, S5, S6, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B9
Apply Systems Concepts
Apply various suitable systems concepts (e.g., feedback, requisite variety, emergence), models and tools (e.g., System Dynamics, Viable System Model, Soft System Modelling, Critical System Heuristics) to map out and build an initial understanding of the problem context, identify gaps in information, and develop data/evidence acquisition plan.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Initial problem statement, agreed with decision-makers; models and rich pictures that capture holistic view of system. Information plan outlining data sets of acceptable size and quality to develop system model(s).
KSBs: K1, K2, S1, S2, S3, S6, B5, B6, B8, B9
Design the Systemic Approach
Design the systemic approach (i.e., dealing with the complex, dynamic, and emergent properties of the whole, rather than simply as a set of individual parts, and addressing relationships with the broader environment) to be taken, with decision-makers and/or stakeholders, to explore, understand and define the problem situation; continuously iterate and evolve the approach, scope, and plan as new data and insights emerge.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Co-developed, structured, outline plan to address the problem (may be phased) that embraces a holistic, multi-stakeholder approach; multiple iterations adapted to meet changing needs and insights.
KSBs: K1, K2, K3, S2, S7, S9, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B8, B9
Continuously Evolve Stakeholder Engagement
(Co)design and continuously evolve a stakeholder engagement strategy sensitive to political and power dynamics amongst stakeholders; facilitate engagement and dialogue in an ethical and safe environment for stakeholders to share their perspectives, challenge assumptions, and/or contribute information, knowledge, and expertise.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Production of an engagement strategy that identifies relevant stakeholders and is tailored to customers' needs. Outputs from engagement events and reflection on facilitation efficacy.
KSBs: K3, S5, S6, S8, S10, B2, B4, B7, B8, B9
Research and Gather Information
Research and gather information, explore and analyse patterns and trends of behaviour (organisational, social, socio-ecological), and develop initial conceptual models. Use the models to identify stakeholder enquiry needs and potential value conflicts. Review boundaries and assumptions.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Production of an initial system model (or models) that capture the holistic set of system elements and their relationships. Refined stakeholder engagement plan and inquiry protocols.
KSBs: K1, K2, K3, S3, S4, S5, S6, B5, B9
Design and Facilitate Specific Engagement Activities
Design and facilitate specific engagement activities to gather information, explore multiple perspectives and build shared systemic models of the organisational, social, or socio-ecological system in focus.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Programme of engagement activities (e.g., workshops) that explore the customer’s and stakeholders’ perspectives, assumptions, knowledge, and experiences. Findings captured in raw form and analysed; confirmation bias monitored.
KSBs: K2, K3, S3, S5, S8, B2, B4, B5, B7, B8, B9
Use Systems Tools and Models
Use systems tools, models, and concepts to study and explain how the current complex set of behaviours observed are being generated. Identify driving forces, causal factors, critical uncertainties, potential threats and risks to the organisation, society, or ecology and opportunities. Identify individuals and groups who are able to influence change and refine engagement strategy. Assess whether current strategy, policy, and plans are fit for purpose.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Production of a system model (or models) that produce typical as-is performance when real-world variations in forces and factors are played through it. Modelling to defined standards and technical tests; ability to validate model using information gathered. Diagnosis of root causes. Analysis of effectiveness of current strategy, policy, or plans.
KSBs: K1, K2, K3, S1, S3, S4, B2, B6
Use Collaborative Futures Thinking Techniques
Use collaborative futures thinking techniques to explore future challenges, critical uncertainties, potential risks to the organisation, society, or ecology, prospective opportunities and risks, and what success in the future looks like.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Development of scenarios that customers and stakeholders consider represent plausible futures. System model(s) of plausible futures and success criteria and sensitivity and robustness checking.
KSBs: K1, K2, K3, K5, S5, S10, B3, B7, B8
Develop and Test Systemic Intervention Options
Use a range of systems tools and models to identify, develop, and test possible systemic intervention options, including the design of or changes to existing organisations, social, and technical systems. Identify and make explicit some of the difficult choices and trade-offs. Support decision-makers and stakeholders to reflect upon and reach consensus or accommodations (where possible) over the most suitable option for moving forward.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Production of possible systemic intervention options and selection criteria. Evidence of comparative effectiveness of options from modelling. Accepted, implementable recommendations for policy, strategy, organisational and/or societal change that will achieve the decision-makers’ and stakeholders’ short/medium/long term objectives.
KSBs: K1, K2, K3, S3, S4, S5, S7, S8, B2, B4, B5, B6, B8
Design Systemic Intervention Approach
Design systemic intervention approach and support decision-makers to develop an intervention plan, formulate future vision and develop communication and engagement strategy that underpins successful execution. Establish systemic measures, proxies, and indicators for monitoring the effectiveness of interventions.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Developed and agreed systemic intervention design, plan, and set of measures.
KSBs: K3, K5, S7, S8, S10, B2
Explore and Negotiate Ethics of Intervention
Support decision-makers to explore and negotiate the ethics of intervention with stakeholders, dealing with value conflicts and power dynamics.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Development of activities and models that evaluate the ethical issues and seek to balance ethical concerns.
KSBs: K4, S5, S8, S10, B2, B4, B5, B7
Design Monitoring and Evaluation Processes
(Co-)design and enable relevant monitoring and evaluation processes to assess the efficacy of interventions, anticipated and unanticipated outcomes and impacts, and on-going stakeholder participation and experience. Produce reports and propose feedback mechanisms to decision-makers and other stakeholders.
Criteria for Measuring Performance: Monitoring and evaluation plan and process. Synthesis of outcomes, impacts, consequences, stakeholder experience, learning; accessible reporting that enables future action decisions.
KSBs: K3, K5, S8, S11, B5, B7
Knowledge:
Skills:
Behaviours:
At NeuroThinking Institute, we are committed to empowering organizations through our comprehensive Systems Thinking program. If you would like to learn more about how this program can benefit your organization, or if you have any questions regarding enrollment, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us.
Contact Us:
Email: Berisford@business-academy.co.za | info@neurothinkinginstitute.com
Phone: +27 77 271 7025
We look forward to assisting you in navigating the complexities of Systems Thinking.